Short Sales Help in Plain Language
By Robert Freedman, Senior Editor, REALTOR® Magazine
Since the beginning of the short-sale problem, NAR members have been seeking plain-language, common-sense tips for dealing with these difficult transactions. We tried to help fill the information gap earlier this year with two free webinars, one in March and one in May, with Scott Thompson, a short-sale specialist who shared his ideas in a way that seemed to resonate with our members. The last time I checked, just under 39,000 of you either attended, viewed, or downloaded the two webinars. They were also incorporated into NAR’s new Short Sales and Foreclosures Resource Certification (SFR) curriculum.
![Image7[1] Lynn Madison](http://speakingofrealestate.blogs.realtor.org/files/2009/11/Image71.jpg)
Lynn Madison
Buyer Reps: Helping Everyone Win in a Short Sale
By Robert Freedman, Senior Editor, REALTOR® Magazine
There’s a temptation among buyers hoping to land a good deal with a short sale to avoid committing themselves with money and effort until the seller’s lender gives its OK, but that’s a sure-fire way to ensure the deal won’t close, short-sales trainer Lynn Madison said Sunday at the 2009 REALTORS® Conference & Expo.
Lenders are too backlogged and have too much to lose to consider offers whose buyers haven’t provided earnest money, had an inspection conducted, or applied for financing, said Madison, who help devise and also teaches classes for NAR’s new Short Sales and Foreclosures Certification Program (SFR).
Doing all of these things—along with submitting a reasonable offer—can improve your client’s chances greatly. This is not the time to low-ball on a property whose value has already deeply plunged, she said. Read more
Stevens Strongly Defends FHA’s Financials
Filed under: Breaking News, Conference & Expo, Mortgage Financing, Politics & Government
By Brian Summerfield, Online Editor, REALTOR® Magazine
In an address to hundreds of REALTORS® at the 2009 NAR Conference & Expo Saturday afternoon, FHA Commissioner David Stevens offered a fervent defense of the organization’s financials. He specifically addressed the negative press surrounding the FHA’s recent audit, which showed part of its capital reserves below congressionally mandated levels.
Stevens distinguished the FHA’s capital reserves for unexpected losses from its regular reserve fund, which remains above 2 percent. Together, the two funds equal almost 4 percent in reserves. “We’ve come through the 100-year flood,” he said. “Despite the crisis, FHA is still standing with $31 billion in capital, $3.5 billion more than it had a year ago.” Read more
Take the Distress Out of Distressed Properties
Filed under: Broker Issues, Conference & Expo, Mortgage Financing, Uncategorized
By Wendy Cole, Senior Editor, REALTOR® Magazine
Foreclosure filings have decreased slightly for the past three months in a row, according to RealtyTrac. While that’s certainly welcome news from a short-term perspective, the larger picture concerning distressed properties remains grim. October 2009 marked the 45th straight month of year-over-year increases in foreclosure activity. In the third quarter of this year alone, there were still more foreclosures than in all of 2006.
At the RISMedia Power Broker Perspective Panel on Distressed Properties, RealtyTrac’s Rick Sharga noted that the year will end with about 3.3 million households having gone into foreclosure. And because of rising “shadow inventory” another 4 million properties are expected to hit foreclosure status in 2010.
The Obama Administration’s recent push to accelerate the pace of loan modifications to keep struggling borrowers in their homes also has a dark side. Some 50-60% of those whose loans are modified are expected to redefault eventually nonetheless.
This massive inventory of distressed properties continues to put significant downward pressure on home prices nationally, and makes it tempting for real estate practitioners to slip into a state of powerlessness and discouragement. That’s a huge mistake. Read more
HVCC: Bad Code or Badly Implemented Code?
By Robert Freedman, senior editor, REALTOR® Magazine
The Home Valuation Code of Conduct is getting a bad rap for causing what real estate professionals say is a rise in inaccurate appraisals, Alfred Pollard told a packed room of REALTORS® Friday in a risk management-regulatory issues joint forum at the 2009 NAR Conference & Expo in San Diego.

Mark Johnson, chief operating officer of appraisal management company LSI.
Pollard, the general counsel for the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), said HVCC was released at a time when the economy was in a massive contraction—what he called a systemic event—and that this broader picture has to be taken into consideration when talking about valuation trends. “Concerns [over valuations] might not be 100-percent tied to this code,” he said.
FHFA oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which earlier this year adopted HVCC and applied it nationwide in an agreement with the New York attorney general. HVCC expires in late 2010 but the two secondary mortgage market companies can retain all or parts of HVCC going forward.
Nor is it fair to rap all appraisal management companies (AMCs) for handing out valuation assignments to inexperienced or out-of-market appraisers who are willing to work for reduced fees, Mark Johnson, COO of LSI, a big AMC, said at the forum.
Any AMC that lets appraisers work outside their area of geographic competency is violating appraisal standards under USPAP and they should be reported, he said. “I do believe there have been some bad actors,” he said. Read more
FHA Eases Concentration, Other Condo Rules
Filed under: Breaking News, Conference & Expo, Mortgage Financing, Politics & Government
By Robert Freedman, Senior Editor, REALTOR® Magazine
In an effort to give condo lending a boost, FHA yesterday released a mortgagee letter (2009-46 A) that lets lenders make loans to condo buyers even if it means 100 percent of the project units would have FHA financing.
That’s a level of market exposure far above what FHA is allowing in its baseline rules (which you’ll find in another mortgagee letter: 2009-46 B), which limit FHA concentration to no more than 30 percent of units.
FHA is also easing its 50-percent owner-occupancy requirement—long an industry concern—by allowing lenders to exclude foreclosed properties in their calculation. That could go a long way in helping buyers in the hardest-hit areas tap FHA financing because it means none of a project’s distressed units count against the owner-occupancy limit.
The agency’s also allowing lenders to make spot loan approvals until February 1, 2010. If you’re not familiar with spot approval, it’s an authority given to lenders to finance one unit in a project that hasn’t yet been approved by FHA for financing.
These and a few other changes that reflect a realistic assessment of today’s market conditions take effect Dec. 7 and they last, with the exception of the spot approvals, until the end of 2010.
If you’re going to San Diego for the 2009 REALTORS® Conference & Expo this week, make it a point to hear FHA Commissioner David Stevens in the An Hour with the FHA Commissioner session. Read more
New Financial Regulator Would Impact You
Filed under: Breaking News, Mortgage Financing, Politics & Government
By Robert Freedman, Senior Editor, REALTOR® Magazine
But not in the way you might think.
A new financial regulator is in the works but it’s one of those developments that’s easily lost in the news while other federal initiatives command the headlines.
The Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), which passed the House Financial Services Committee just a few weeks ago, would represent a sweeping change in the way financial services companies are regulated. Right now, our alphabet soup of federal banking regulators—OCC, FDIC, NCUA, and so on—have two missions: 1) to oversee the safety and soundness of financial services companies, and 2) to protect consumers.
The logic behind CFPA is to split off the consumer-protection side of the regulators’ portfolio so they can focus on bank safety and soundness. The new agency would focus on consumer protection.
What’s key for real estate professionals is that CFPA will focus only on financial services companies. That seems obvious, but it wasn’t always this way. As the language was originally drafted, any number of professional services that handle money in some way would have fallen under the definition of financial services. Thus, real estate professionals, who handle earnest-money deposits among other things, could have been subject to regulation under CFPA.

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman, House Financial Services Committee, and chief sponsor of CFPA legislation.
The fact that the House Financial Services Committee makes clear in its bill that real estate brokers and sales associates aren’t regulated under CFPA is an advocacy victory for REALTORS®, who, through NAR, let lawmakers know that the original draft would lead to unforseen consequences if it wasn’t changed. It was.
You should be aware that CFPA could still touch the real estate transaction in several ways, though. Read more
The Tax Credit Vs. Cash for Clunkers
Filed under: Economics, Mortgage Financing, Politics & Government
By Brian Summerfield, Online Editor, REALTOR® Magazine
Amid several news reports that the first-time home buyer tax credit will almost certainly be extended, I’ve seen more than a few blogs and online comments arguing against it. Some of them say the government can’t afford it, and lament the fact that we’re borrowing from our children and grandchildren to pay for this. Others maintain that the tax credit artificially stimulates demand, and the market will resume its slump whenever it does expire. Still others claim that it hasn’t really motivated enough buyers who would not have otherwise purchased a home to justify the program.
I may disagree with some of these arguments, but I’m glad people are making them. It’s essential that we have a healthy debate on this important subject rather than move forward with our eyes closed and our mouths shut.
However, there is one argument that I take issue with: The tax credit and the “Cash for Clunkers” program are essentially the same thing. I’ve read this line of reasoning in a few places, and in each instance, it seems to confuse rather than clarify. It seems to me that the two initiatives are very different in a few significant ways: Read more
Stevens: Facts Getting Lost in FHA Safety Debate
Filed under: Mortgage Financing, Politics & Government
By Robert Freedman, Senior Editor, REALTOR® Magazine
“Nobody has asked to come in and look at our balance sheet, to go through our finances, which I’ve offered to everybody.”—FHA Commissioner David Stevens

News reports raising concerns that FHA might be the next major financial institution requiring a government infusion are based on misinformed comparisons with what happened in the subprime market, FHA Commissioner David Stevens said in an exclusive interview with REALTOR® Magazine this week.
At their peak, subprime lenders commanded 40 percent of the residential mortgage market by making low-downpayment, no-document, interest-only, and other types of exotic loans to high-risk borrowers, investors, and speculators, a market that FHA sat out entirely, says Stevens.
Today, it’s FHA that commands 40 percent of the market, but that’s where the comparison ends. The agency makes 30-year, fixed-rate, fully documented loans only for households buying their primary residence. For each loan, the agency maintains capital reserves for the full 30 years of the loan rather than for the 1-2 years required of banks.
Today, the agency has more than $30 billion in reserves, including a fully funded loan-loss reserve. All the talk in the media about reserves dipping below a 2-percent required threshold is about a secondary account that’s above and beyond the agency’s primary reserve. Those two accounts together represent more than 4 percent of assets, he says.
An actuarial audit of FHA finances due out in a few weeks from a non-governmental auditor is expected to find that FHA has sufficient capital to cover all forecasted losses, even assuming further delines in home prices, says Stevens.
“What concerns me, and I think should concern all REALTORS®, is . . . non-fact-based [criticism] from people who jump to conclusions without looking at data [and] create an environment where we’ll be forced to make corrections where they are not required and can hurt this housing recovery.”
Stevens sat down with the magazine for a 30-minute interview that covered the agency’s new appraisal policy and an upcoming mortgagee letter that’s expected to make condo financing more attractive as well as the agency’s credit health. He also talked about the improvements to the agency’s processing that makes it comparable to conventional lenders in terms of processing speed and paperwork requirements.
Listen to snippets of the conversation here: Read more
Jumbo Freeze Might be Thawing
By Robert Freedman, senior editor, REALTOR® Magazine
It’s still early but there are signs the availability of jumbo financing might be improving—although underwriting standards probably won’t ease any time soon. That means the days of creditworthy borrowers having a tough time getting financing for an amount over the conforming loan limit might be ending but they’ll still have to come up with a significant down payment and be prepared to show lots of documentation, like three years worth of tax returns instead of the customary two.
NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun says lenders are slowly getting back into the game because the climate of dread is lifting: Wall Street analysts and business executives have recalibrated their performance scenarios to reflect the greatly improved conditions among lower-priced homes (thanks to the home buyer tax credit and steeply discounted pricing). That in turn is creating a virtuous cycle as the improved scenarios help relax concerns over the economy, pushing up equities, which in turn creates the wealth that further increases confidence.
Read more

