Chuck Reed

We Know We Need Housing and How to Get It. Unfortunately, That’s Where We Stop

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “We Know We Need Housing and How to Get It. Unfortunately, That’s Where We Stop”.

Comments
  1. Solving housing issues in California or other high-population and expensive markets won’t be simple. Of course regulations need to be streamlined; these were likely added one layer at a time, all with good intentions, or to address a specific item or grievance, and may need to be peeled back, layer by layer just to get to a manageable core set.

    It might also help if towns and builders look for ways to avoid working at odds with one another or at various ends of the extreme. Every new development project doesn’t need to be either high-end “”luxury”" or low-end “”high-density.”" Where are the neighborhoods of two-to-four family homes that used to be built?

    Assuming a builder’s business motive is to maximize return on a project, then avoiding legal battles is imperative. Instead, review a proposed project, compare it against projects that are acceptable to the town/neighbors/region and consider ways to “”fill in”" this profit gap for the builder using public and private funds. The builder gets to build and achieves maximum return, the area gets the kind of development that is desirable for it, and monies are spent not on lengthy legal battles but on getting the right project for the area completed as quickly as possible.

ADD YOUR COMMENT